31.8.11

Its it too big? Is it too small?

Who Am I? What Am I?



It seems I'm going through a spiritual adolescence. The kind of self discovery gig you go through in your mid to late teens. “Do you like me - Why do you like me? - would you really care if I was to die tomorrow?” - That kind of stuff. Except this time it's accompanied by a balding head and a widening girth rather than zits and hormones and it's got more to do with self discovery rather than my self image.

The fact that I'm on a journey of discovery was highlighted for me a couple of times over the past few days. Firstly when I watched TV on Sat night heard again the now deceased American comedian Bill Hicks “It's just a Ride” speech:

It made me cry. On many levels.

It made me realise that certain parts of my “christian walk” have indeed been part of the bigger ride that is the church, theology, institutionalism, dogma. I've been a part of the “work a day church” (possibly I still am?) and at the moment I've chosen to get off of that ride. Not because it was too fast (I don't like fast rides) but because it was like the ghost train – too scary, too many dark corners with demons lurking in them. Demons with names like Control and Authority. But it's ok to get off the train because after all I paid to get on, so it's my prerogative to choose to dismount cos “it's just a ride”

Secondly, I reckon Jesus tried to tell us something different about the world through his philosophies – maybe not with the same theology as Hicks but he did try to make it clear through the language and culture of the day that “you don't have to swallow or follow this shit” - meaning the religious rhetoric and control of the priests and the Pharisees. They didn't like it did they. They had a lot invested on the ride. “Shut him up” was the order.

Lastly. The end part just tickled my hippy nerve a bit. “Here's what you can do to change the world, right now, to a better ride. Take all that money that we spend on weapons and defence each year, and instead spend it feeding, clothing and educating the poor of the world, which it would many times over, not one human being excluded, and we could explore space, together, both inner and outer, for ever, in peace”. - Beautiful words Bill. Too political? Or worse mixing politics with religion? You bet your arse it is.

I might be wrong but I reckon Jesus (being God apart .....) was a bit of a political hippy. His message of The Kingdom of God being for the here and now and not some pie in the sky when you die deal was full of that last Hicks paragraph. Justice and equality for all. Don't take my word on this though. There are over 2000 bits in the Bible that tell christians that.
Check em out.

Also as I re read Jesus own mission statement ; “God’s spirit is upon me, He has sent me to bring good news to the poor, to bind up the broken hearted, to proclaim freedom for the prisoners
and recovery of sight for the blind, to release the oppressed,.”

I can't help but reflect how literally this passage is taken in terms of it's Spiritual connotations. I've no doubt that it is a proclamation from Jesus that he is the “Chosen One”, that he is in fact God (no wonder the religious folk were pissed off. However, I think it it says so much more and I'm pretty sure Jesus meant it to. It's speaks of the spiritually poor and the literal poor. It speaks of the spiritually blind and also of the physically disadvantaged. I reckon the message Jesus was delivering was for the people of the day and for the people of today. I think he had a here and now justice and mercy agenda. It's definitely pertinent in England at this moment in the shadow of the recent riots. I'm not a great fan of ex prime minister Blair (even less so of the current leader and his puppy) but I agree with his recent statement on the riots when he said;

“I do think there are major issues underlying the anxieties reflected in disturbances and protests in many nations. One is the growing disparity of incomes not only between poor and rich but between those at the top and the aspiring middle class”.

I'm of the opinion that the splits in society are growing and that folk are frustrated by the concept of the haves and have nots whilst living in a must have society. Why? My thoughts at this time are down to the poverty of aspiration and lack of vision for how to get out of the social rut.

It's IS doable. It always has been. I did it and my best friend from my school days did it. We both grew up in poor working class families from a mining community. But we were allowed to dream, we were encouraged to have ambitions. I'm not sure that the same liberty to aspire to “better things” is encouraged either in family homes nor in broken communities.



Another thing that happened to make me realise my “teenage angst” was receiving an excellent thank you card from my friend Rachel which speaks for itself given my current position and state of mind: 



Finally for today, my friend Redhead encouraged me in a FaceAche post concerning my reluctance to spend time around god botherers that “There is hope beyond the cynical and disenfranchised phase”. My response was that I am very happy being cynical and disenfranchised. I honestly am.

It's about choices isn't it? “But it doesn't matter because: it's just a ride. And we can change it anytime we want. It's only a choice. No effort, no work, no job, no savings, and money. A choice, right now, between fear and love. The eyes of fear want you to put bigger locks on your doors, buy guns, close yourselves off. The eyes of love, instead, see all of us as one”.

And right now I choose to grow me hair and explore space.

Who am I? What am I?   

Today I am that fearful creature – a existentialist – I am Zen Dog



19.8.11

The Holy Spiggot!

We all make misteaks



Based on my Blog "The Joy of Texts" earlier in the week can I add briefly:

Signed up christians of Orthodox faiths in the main would claim that the Bible is infallible. Or some "inerrant." "'Inerrant' means there are no errors; 'infallible' means there can be no errors." - no mistakes then. Hmmm. Well I disagree. The original ancient languages of Hebrew and Greek are still being translated, the new translations hold new meanings, sometimes dramatically so and as such I find Biblical texts / scripture very difficult to accept on an intellectual level, as Plenary – absolute truth – absolutely “God breathed”. God inspired no doubt but directly out of Gods gob? I think not. God I reckon wouldn't make mistakes as obvious as typo's and mispronunciations.

For many disillusioned god botherers and many many more atheists this has become a key stone to their fading faith or lack of it.

It needs far more discussion than the few lines I'm offering up now but as a thumbnail sketch of my current position I'd like to state for the record that it doesn't bother me a jot (in terms of my faith in Jesus) that there are questionable and contradictory elements to the holy book of christians. It is THE most incredible signpost to God in my opinion. It does bother me however, that even though this is common knowledge amongst theologians, ministers, priests, vicars, pastors etc that the text is treated as The Law and that questionable contents are used and abused to pressurise or control people. Surely, this wouldn't be a loving God's plan? And I do believe in a loving and compassionate God.

So why did bring this up again? Well actually it was so I could just lend a bit of support to my brother Dave. Dave's a stinking heathen of an atheist and I love him very much. He made a mistake reading an appointment date for some pretty important hospital tests that he thought he'd be having today. It's actually next week. So in making the mistake he's caused himself quite a bit of distress and I dare say anguish as he was waiting and now has to wait even longer. I'd just like to say Dave, we all make mistakes mate and at least your misunderstanding probably wont lead to any wars or persecution. Shalom.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yh-eMuIVGgU

18.8.11

Shit Happens - Don't Blame God


Life, Death & Do-Do


My friend Redhead wrote a great piece on her blog this morning.  I suggest you check it out and read her story too.  
http://sallyanndyer.wordpress.com/2011/08/18/lucky-to-be-alive/

Tragedy makes my faith stronger too, but my response is less eloquent than hers -  Shit happens - Don't Blame God:

Close-to-complete Ideology and Religion Shit List

    • Taoism: Shit happens.

    • Confucianism: Confucius say, "Shit happens."

    • Buddhism: If shit happens, it isn't really shit.

    • Zen Buddhism: Shit is, and is not.

    • Zen Buddhism #2: What is the sound of shit happening?

    • Hinduism: This shit has happened before.

    • Islam: If shit happens, it is the will of Allah.

    • Islam #2: If shit happens, kill the person responsible.

    • Islam #3: If shit happens, blame Israel.

    • Catholicism: If shit happens, you deserve it.

    • Protestantism: Let shit happen to someone else.

    • Presbyterian: This shit was bound to happen.

    • Episcopalian: It's not so bad if shit happens, as long as you serve the right wine with it.

    • Methodist: It's not so bad if shit happens, as long as you serve grape juice with it.

    • Congregationalist: Shit that happens to one person is just as good as shit that happens to another.

    • Unitarian: Shit that happens to one person is just as bad as shit that happens to another.

    • Lutheran: If shit happens, don't talk about it.

    • Fundamentalism: If shit happens, you will go to hell, unless you are born again. (Amen!)

    • Fundamentalism #2: If shit happens to a televangelist, it's okay.

    • Fundamentalism #3: Shit must be born again.

    • Judaism: Why does this shit always happen to us?

    • Calvinism: Shit happens because you don't work.

    • Seventh Day Adventism: No shit shall happen on Saturday.

    • Creationism: God made all shit.

    • Secular Humanism: Shit evolves.

    • Christian Science: When shit happens, don't call a doctor - pray!

    • Christian Science #2: Shit happening is all in your mind.

    • Unitarianism: Come let us reason together about this shit.

    • Quakers: Let us not fight over this shit.

    • Utopianism: This shit does not stink.

    • Darwinism: This shit was once food.

    • Capitalism: That's MY shit.

    • Communism: It's everybody's shit.

    • Feminism: Men are shit.

    • Chauvinism: We may be shit, but you can't live without us...

    • Commercialism: Let's package this shit.

    • Impressionism: From a distance, shit looks like a garden.

    • Idolism: Let's bronze this shit.

    • Existentialism: Shit doesn't happen; shit IS.

    • Existentialism #2: What is shit, anyway?

    • Stoicism: This shit is good for me.

    • Hedonism: There is nothing like a good shit happening!

    • Mormonism: God sent us this shit.

    • Mormonism #2: This shit is going to happen again.

    • Wiccan: An it harm none, let shit happen.

    • Scientology: If shit happens, see "Dianetics", p.157.

    • Jehovah's Witnesses: >Knock< >Knock< Shit happens.

    • Jehovah's Witnesses #2: May we have a moment of your time to show you some of our shit?

    • Jehovah's Witnesses #3: Shit has been prophesied and is imminent; only the righteous shall survive its happening.

    • Moonies: Only really happy shit happens.

    • Hare Krishna: Shit happens, rama rama.

    • Rastafarianism: Let's smoke this shit!

    • Zoroastrianism: Shit happens half on the time.

    • Church of SubGenius: BoB shits.

    • Practical: Deal with shit one day at a time.

    • Agnostic: Shit might have happened; then again, maybe not.

    • Agnostic #2: Did someone shit?

    • Agnostic #3: What is this shit?

    • Satanism: SNEPPAH TIHS.

    • Atheism: What shit?

    • Atheism #2: I can't believe this shit!

    • Nihilism: No shit.

    • Narcisism: I am the shit!

    • And of course we must add...

    • Alcoholics Anonymous: Shit happens-one day at a time!

               
- With thanks to Dan The JayWalker

17.8.11

The Joy of Texts

A Conversation on FaceAche Yesterday:

ORIGINAL POST: The Christ Paul met was not the historical Jesus in the flesh, but the risen and eternal Christ that had exploded into history for him—and for us. His most common single phrase in all his letters is “en Cristo,” his code word for a life and energy field that fills and surrounds everything. This cosmic Christ is a “knowing” that you only come to by personal experience. You cannot prove it to anybody who is not there herself. ( RR again)
      ·
      REPLY: ‎"Life and energy field" is not a scriptural phrase or category. The New Testament says that only Christians are in Christ, and therefore the concept of being in Christ most definitely cannot refer to a life and energy field that fills and surrounds everything. This is a new age concept with no foundation in Scripture whatsoever.
      ME - So what? - I believe 100% that Jesus is God - I have faith in Jesus, I follow Him, I worship Him. I don't believe in scripture - Do we worship the same or a different Jesus?
      "REPLYER” If anyone is in Christ they are a new creation" (2 Corinthians 5:17). So How can in Christ mean a life and energy field surrounding everything, without the whole world having been saved and reborn? This is unscriptural and bogus: Ii don't care who RR is they are out of the New Testament here.
      ME: I repeat so what? Can you only believe in Jesus if you follow (and quote) the New Testament as total truth. Would your faith in Jesus be worthless if you no longer used the guide book? Would Jesus still have faith in you?
      ORIGINAL POSTER Oooh! A big discussion! You can all decide what you think for yourselves - I am not taking sides! Yes, good evangelical viewpoint, REPLYER. The RR is Richard Rohr, a Franciscan priest: he often says controversial things and uses worldly words to make his point, but he is a true follower of Jesus. His point about the 'Cosmic Christ' is what Phil says - Jesus fills everything. Yes, He is the only Saviour! Read some more Rohr and you'll get more where 'the dude' is coming from.
      Ray - do you really not believe in Scripture at all? You are a worse case than I thought! ;-)
      NEW POST: Can anyone else "hear" ORIGINAL's celebration of Jesus? Why not paint our glorious Jesus with all the colours from this awesome Universe's palette? I know ORIGINAL - she is not advocating a universalist pantheism. Her quote might borrow concepts from quantum physics; and perhaps the discontinuity between the historical Jesus of Nazareth and the post-Resurrection Christ of faith is a little too pronounced but, to be fair, it is impossible to contain all balanced truth in one sentence isnt it? Provided that the basic christology is correct then what's the problem? In fact her christology is so correct that when I look at her I see Jesus. And when I grow up I want to be like ORIGINAL and who knows, I might even become more like Jesus...
      ORIGINAL POSTER: WHAAHH! “NEW POST”! You men are all so serious and heavy duty! And guess what - I love you all - Anglican vicar with wonderful wooden cross round neck, crazy poet and provocateur, sometime red-haired drummer aka Animal, slightly slipped questioning ex charismatic... You are ALL my brothers and Dad says 'Love one another' So there! ;-)
      ME: I am in a bad way aren't I “ORIGINAL”! I'm just waiting for the thunderbolt and & my bits to explode ! I don't Believe in the Bible. I trust in it's wisdom, but I no longer accept it's inner rant ( spelling mine) and plenary status. I find it's constant use as a lever very controlling. I have used and abused it when I pastored, and I have had it used as a weapon against me. I have no problems with people who do believe the god breathed title it has acquired although I do get angry when scripture is dogmatically applied. Dogma dulls the wits. We can all get clever, clever and play theological scriptural tennis but in the end the ball will go out of play. Your application of the teachings of Richard Rohr fit perfectly into the conversation and your open and enquiring mind is to be applauded.
      ORIGINAL POSTER then gave out my blog address: www.alwayspersonalneverprivate.blogspot.com They said - You might find a lot you agree with! They then said - Thanks for the kind words and support, guys. I love the Scriptures but they are of course written by men (no women?) and open to all sorts of interpretation... We have had some set interpretations and now they are being questioned more and more. Nothing to be scared of - God is bigger than that: God is LOVE xx

So there we are a conversation about differences in approach to worshipping the same God. Or is it the same God? The REPLYER never got back to us in answer to my questions. Maybe they couldn't be arsed or maybe they are too steeped in the religion and dogma as I suggested to risk mixing with we unclean sorts to carry on the discussion.

The Jesus I follow used to get pretty pissed off with the overtly religious sorts around him. They were known as Pharisees. Jesus accused them of hypocrisy and pretentiousness, and pronounced upon them a succession of “woes” - his exclamation of great sorrow and distress in their ways – at one point calling them a brood of vipers! Something tells me he wasn't enamoured with religiosity.

Neither am I that's why I said I get angry with closed minds which in my opinion leads to closed hearts and the kind of exclusivity that REPLYER suggests - “Christians Only”.

It was great that the “NEW POSTER came to support the ORIGINAL POSTER with which if simplified into plain English would be a great statement of faith. I whole heartedly agree on one point when they say “it is possible to contain all balanced truth in one sentence isnt it”? - I reckon you can ;

“God IS”

Still I could be wrong ( it has to happen one day) and if so maybe I need to say sorry and repent (my arse). The timing of my friend The Naked Pastor was excellent with his cartoon today which begins this blog.

Anyhow – Following this exchange I've some food for thought for a couple of other things I might want to share with you............... Catch you later Plebs.

PS Thanks Redhead for being the ORIGINATOR!

15.8.11

The Wisdom of Baba Billy

Baba Billy

"Before you judge a man, walk a mile in his shoes. After that, who cares? ...He's a mile away and you've got his shoes".

"I don't believe in angels and I have trouble with the whole God thing. I don't want to say I don't believe in God, but I don't think I do. But I believe in people who do".

"If Jesus was a Jew, how come he has a Mexican first name"?


"It seems to me that Islam and Christianity and Judaism all have the same god, and he's telling them all different things".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKMjmzkNfxs&feature=related


Fornication, Spiritual Surfing and God Realization

St George


I got a text of of my mate Pete today. Pete used to work for me. Pete is one of lifes characters. Witty, sharp, intelligent & Scouse (read scally). Pete usually sends me offensive texts, jokes about current affairs etc and I pretend not to read or laugh at them (though obviously I do – sometimes to my own shame). Any how, his text today was of a different type and calibre:

“You can't stop the waves, but you can learn to surf”

It's a great line innit? It rang true for a couple of reasons.

One: my lad Rory really got into surfing whilst we were on holiday in the Gower recently. Rory is a git. He is better than me in almost everything he tries. He's much more skilful than I was at rugby. His guitar skills are getting rather good. Academically he's a bit bright. He's not as handsome as me obviously, but he does seem to attract the chicks (something I failed at until Audrey took pity on me). On the surf board he was a natural. He was reading the waves and riding them on day one. Like I say, he's a git.

Two: When Pete worked for me I was well and truly engrossed in the church – not religious thank god, but certainly fervent and evangelical in that I was certain that everyone was entitled to my opinion. Pete at some stage made it known that he wasn't into the “church shite” (was he a prophetic angel?) and suggested I read a book on Zen Buddhism (The Way of Zen – Alan W Watts) and work out my self before I tried work out god. How dare he proselytise to me!

Three: The latter half of last week as you remember I became an apprentice christian Buddhist.

Four: I'm a George Harrison fan. He was by far my favourite ex Beatle. George was a deeply spiritual person. A follower of the Hindu, ,Hare Krishna tradition. He once said "Everything else can wait, but the search for God cannot...". I like that and I think Pete would have too.

So, where am i going with this diatribe? I suppose what is apparent in my starting this Blog is that I have a few issues to deal with involving my christian faith and I'm learning a little more everyday that my walk needs to be much more, MUCH MORE, spiritual. I'm carrying some hurts and baggage associated with the orthodox church and some of its members. However, I'm starting to truly realize that my faith has nothing to do with the church or it's people (apart from circumstantial). It's all to do with the spiritual awakening I had during a real God moment and a couple of other God experiences I've had since over the years (more of that another time).

I wrote on my “About Me”, that I'm a Dweller on the Threshold – a nod to Van Morrison. But it's true. I've been on this god journey for years now and I'm only just begining to see it for what means. It is truly a journey and I've but taken a few steps. 

I reckon I'm on the right path in that I have a God Realization, but I'm only starting to see where I might fit into Gods plans (if indeed God has plans). In the christian bible there's a book called Romans and we are told to “offer our bodies as living sacrifices…” because “this is your SPIRITUAL act of worship” Worship I suppose is placing value on God, catching his waves, to appraise HIS value.

The I God I believe in is called Jesus. Christians talk of Jesus being a saviour (we'll discuss the relevance of this term for the 21st C and the enormous weight it carries another time too). Zen is oft described as “a way of liberation”. What's become apparent since Petes text this morning is that some of the beef I have with my past connections with the church are simply waves and that if I work harder on focusing in on Jesus then maybe I'll learn to surf as well as my lad. So, the question is not whether or not surfing is spiritual, rather is riding the waves my spiritual act of worship?

There's a preacher out there warned me about Satan
Could be that he knows him
Cause' He acts like he's possessed
I said 'Hey man let's hear about God realisation
For a change'
he said "We ain't got time for that
First you must hear the evils of fornication"

12.8.11

The Second Coming of Buddah

Buddha v Jesus Mega Mix:

I'm running into a bit of a problem with Buddhism. It's disappointing really as I was starting to enjoy the ride. My concerns are with the diet and I do enjoy me grub.

As I said yesterday, I have been looking at reincarnation today and that's where I discovered that I might have a problem. The first Precept in Buddhism is often interpreted as ‘do not harm,’ and many Buddhists choose to be vegetarian as a result of this precept. One basic tenet of Buddhism is that of reincarnation and the belief that animals can be reincarnated as humans and vice versa. As a result, Buddhists do not kill animals, and many do not eat meat or fish because this is considered to be bad for their karma and you could end up eating someone that you know. I suppose it would be like being part of the “Meet and Eat” team at a Sunday service.

I'm not opposed to becoming a veggie per se as the forbidden meat list seems to be predominantly humans, elephants, horses, dogs, snakes, lions, tigers, boars and hyenas. I'm fairly certain I could give those up. I am partial however to the average meat stocks of cows, pigs, sheep and cattle. Also I'm not sure I could give up ant eaters either, after all a little aardvark never hurt anybody! (BOOM BOOM!)

Possibly more difficult for me would be to refrain from eating the “Five Pungent Spices” such as garlic, onion and leek, because they are considered to increase one’s sexual desire and anger – Well I don't believe that for a minute and I'll fight anyone who says different although my wife might like the idea of my constant begging becoming a thing of the past.

Anyhow. Enough of the food talk. It's making me peckish. Back to reincarnation.

Although the idea that Kate Bush and I might get the chance to become intimate (but not if i keep up with the pungent spices) is possible via reincarnation it seems the odds are stacked against me. I'm more likely to be a fruit fly or similar so the chances of me taking a stab at romance with the lovely Kate would be pretty slim even if I lead a really good and spiritually faithful life – so balls to that.

STOP PRESS: I just used a reincarnation calculator and the odds are that I'll be coming back as a rhino. It says; 27% of folk will get a higher life form reincarnation than me...... I still get the horn though eh? (sorry). www.reincarnationstation.com

Obviously 2 days as a Buddhist isn't really giving it a real chance but I think I've sussed enough to embrace the philosophy. The non-aggressive, moral and philosophical system expounded by the Buddha, which demands no blind faith from its adherents, expounds no dogmatic creeds, encourages no superstitious rites and ceremonies, but advocates a golden mean that guides a disciple through pure living and pure thinking to the gain of supreme wisdom and deliverance from all evil, is in fact I reckon a rather brilliant philosophy.

I'm fairly sure I could add this philosophy to my cannon of beliefs and still let Jesus be the governor.

Simplistically Jesus and the Buddha agree that pursuing happiness in transient things is futile, but they direct us to opposite solutions. The Buddha says suffering is caused by desire and “happiness” is overcoming all desire and treasuring nothing. Jesus on the other hand says desire is not the cause of suffering per se, but is in part due to desiring the wrong things.

Perhaps then true happiness is discovering, pursuing and treasuring what is truly important in the “Kingdom of God”.

To end with I'll let you take a peek at a web site that would certainly keep me from seeking Jesus and would prohibit my becoming a Buddhist due to the ill thought and violence i could bring upon it's authors... what a load of twaddle.
http://fundamentalbaptistchristian.blogspot.com/2011/02/why-jesus-is-better-than-buddha.html






11.8.11

Come Again?


Come Again? The Core beliefs of Buddhism:

 

OK. I've had a day of being a Buddhist.  To be honest I haven't felt much different. However I did learn some stuff which I thought to be pretty cool and rather familiar, so I'm thinking I'll give it another day.
What is apparent is that like most of the great religions of the world Buddhism is divided into a number of different traditions. However what is also apparent is that most traditions share a common set of fundamental beliefs. Below are what are know as “The Three Trainings or Practices of Buddhism” and a couple of my thoughts beneath:

  1. Sila: Virtue, good conduct, morality. This is based on two fundamental principles:
- The principle of equality: that all living entities are equal.
- The principle of reciprocity: This is the "Golden Rule"


- in Christianity - to do onto others as you would wish them to do onto you.


2. Samadhi: Concentration, meditation, mental development. Developing one's mind is the
path to wisdom which in turn leads to personal freedom. Mental development also strengthens and controls our mind; this helps us maintain good conduct.


- Could be a prayer disipline – being open to what God is trying to tell us.? Seeking truth so that it might set us free?

3. Prajna: Discernment, insight, wisdom, enlightenment. This is the real heart of Buddhism. Wisdom will emerge if your mind is pure and calm.


- The chapter called James in the Bible says this: “But the wisdom that comes from above leads us to be pure, friendly, gentle, sensible, kind, helpful, genuine, andsincere.” - not exactly the same but hey............


Not a bad days experience on the whole.  Tomorrow I'm going to have a go at reincarnation & see if I can't be reborn as Kate Bushes boyfriend.

Rock On or Buddah Off?

Today I will mostly be a Christian Buddhist:
Joining in on friends blog yesterday I made a statement that "I was up for a revolution as long as it allowed for evolution".  Faith needs to be evolutionary. Recognising and practising (a good adjective in many senses) faith needs to be evolutionary.  

So for today I will be practising a bit of Buddhism - seeking truth, enlightenment, peace and happiness....... sounds a bit like core christianity don't you think?

gizakiss

10.8.11

Lets get this show on the road...........

Thousands of times I have heard it both read and said;
"I am the way, the truth and the life. No one comes to the father except through me"
It's a red letter phrase.  Spoken by Jesus, recorded by men, bastardized by theology and used as a threat by Sunday preachers. 

I'm on dodgy ground here as far as God botherers go - I'm starting to shift my thinking somewhat.  We are constantly told that all roads do not lead to God. We are also told that all will finally stand before God on judgement day. We are also told that God is merciful and full of forgiveness, compassion  and grace. 

Ergo if everyone one day stands before him then all roads must lead to his door. 

Or - if we are to believe the scripture, Jesus actually comes to our doors and knocks. That must mean everybody's doors, regardless of the flavour of their faith. 

Does he knock just the once?  Is it a special offer just for today?  Is it a never to be repeated one off kind of opportunity?

Or as I'm starting to think is it something that he will do time and time again. Intimately and infinitely until we stand before him as the great bouncer in the sky, at his door.  

Will he then explain that just like there was always a last chance for the thief on the cross, there are no dress code restrictions in Gods nightclub?
image courtesy of The Naked Pastor: nakedpastor.com